플러스100%마이너스

  • 화면크기
통합검색

한의약융합데이터센터


근거중심한의약 DB

Home > 한의약융합데이터센터 > 근거중심한의약 DB
Title

Associations of processed meat and unprocessed red meat intake with incident diabetes: the Strong Heart Family Study.

Authors

Fretts AM, Howard BV, McKnight B, Duncan GE, Beresford SA, Mete M, Eilat-Adar S, Zhang Y, Siscovick DS.

Journal

Am J Clin Nutr.

Year

2012

Vol (Issue)

95(3)

Page

752-8.

doi

10.3945/ajcn.111.029942.

PMID

22277554

Url

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22277554

MeSH

Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology*
Diabetes Mellitus/etiology
Diet/adverse effects*
Energy Intake*
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Food Handling
Food, Preserved/adverse effects
Humans
Incidence
Indians, North American
Interviews as Topic
Male
Meat/adverse effects*
Meat Products/adverse effects*
Middle Aged
Nutrition Assessment
Prospective Studies
Questionnaires
Risk Factors
Rural Population
United States
Young Adult

Keywords

한글 키워드

KMCRIC summary and commentary

없음

Korean Study

Abstract

BACKGROUND:
Fifty percent of American Indians (AIs) develop diabetes by age 55 y. Whether processed meat is associated with the risk of diabetes in AIs, a rural population with a high intake of processed meat (eg, canned meats in general, referred to as ""spam"") and a high rate of diabetes, is unknown.
OBJECTIVE:
We examined the associations of usual intake of processed meat with incident diabetes in AIs.
DESIGN:
This prospective cohort study included AI participants from the Strong Heart Family Study who were free of diabetes and cardiovascular disease at baseline and who participated in a 5-y follow-up examination (n = 2001). Dietary intake was ascertained by using a Block food-frequency questionnaire at baseline. Incident diabetes was defined on the basis of 2003 American Diabetes Association criteria. Generalized estimating equations were used to examine the associations of dietary intake with incident diabetes.
RESULTS:
We identified 243 incident cases of diabetes. In a comparison of upper and lower quartiles, intake of processed meat was associated with a higher risk of incident diabetes (OR: 1.63; 95% CI: 1.21, 2.63), after adjustment for potential confounders. The relation was particularly strong for spam (OR for the comparison of upper and lower quartiles: 2.06; 95% CI: 1.30, 3.27). Intake of unprocessed red meat was not associated with incident diabetes (OR for the comparison of upper and lower quartiles: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.59, 1.37).
CONCLUSION:
The consumption of processed meat, such as spam, but not unprocessed red meat, was associated with higher risk of diabetes in AIs, a rural population at high risk of diabetes and with limited access to healthy foods.

국문초록

Language

영어

첨부파일