플러스100%마이너스

  • 화면크기
통합검색

한의약융합데이터센터


근거중심한의약 DB

Home > 한의약융합데이터센터 > 근거중심한의약 DB
Title

Potential Benefit With Complementary and Alternative Medicine in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors

Billings W, Mathur K, Craven HJ, Xu H, Shin A.

Journal

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol.

Year

2021

Vol (Issue)

19(8)

Page

1538-53.

doi

10.1016/j.cgh.2020.09.035.

PMID

32961342

Url

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32961342

MeSH

Abdominal Pain
Adult
Complementary Therapies*
Humans
Irritable Bowel Syndrome* / therapy

Keywords

Abdominal Pain; Acupuncture; Body Based; Cognitive Behavioral Therapy; Dietary; Herbal.

한글 키워드

복통; 침 치료; 신체 기반; 인지 행동 치료; 식이요법; 한약.

KMCRIC
Summary & Commentary

KMCRIC 비평 보기 +

Korean Study

Abstract

Background & aims: Patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) may pursue complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). We conducted a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis examining efficacy of CAM vs. placebo or sham in adults with IBS.

Methods: Publication databases were searched for randomized controlled trials of CAM therapies (herbal therapy, dietary supplements, mind-body based, body-based, and energy-healing) in adults with IBS. Data were extracted to obtain pooled estimates of mean improvement in abdominal pain (standardized mean difference [SMD]) and relative risk (RR) of overall response using random effects models. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses along with quality assessments were completed.

Results: Among 2825 articles identified, 66 were included. Herbal therapy (SMD=0.47, 95% CI: 0.20 to 0.75, I2=82%) demonstrated significant benefit over placebo for abdominal pain (low confidence in estimates). Benefit with mind-body based therapy for abdominal pain was of borderline significance (SMD=0.29, 95% CI: -0.01 to 0.59, I2=78%). Herbal therapy (RR=1.57, 95% CI: 1.31 to 1.88, I2=77%), dietary supplements (RR=1.95, 95% CI: 1.02 to 3.73, I2=75%), and mind-body based therapy (RR=1.67, 95% CI: 1.13 to 2.49, I2=63%) showed benefit for overall response compared to placebo (low confidence in estimates). Body-based and energy healing therapies demonstrated no significant benefit over placebo or sham for abdominal pain or overall response.

Conclusions: CAM therapies such as herbal or dietary supplements and mind-body based approaches may be beneficial for abdominal pain and overall response in IBS. However, overall quality of evidence is low. Rigorous, high quality clinical trials are warranted to investigate CAM in IBS.

Copyright © 2021 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

국문초록

N

Language

영어

첨부파일