플러스100%마이너스

통합검색
닫기

KMCRIC 챗봇에게

질문하기!

한의약융합데이터센터


근거중심한의약 DB

Home > 한의약융합데이터센터 > 근거중심한의약 DB
Title

Effectiveness of Kinesio Taping® in Patients With Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis.

Authors

Júnior MADL, Almeida MO, Santos RS, Civile VT, Costa LOP.

Journal

Spine (Phila Pa 1976).

Year

2018

Vol (Issue)

Epub ahead of print

Page

doi

10.1097/BRS.0000000000002756.

PMID

29952880

Url

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29952880

MeSH

Keywords

low back pain; bandage; physical therapy; kinesio taping; tape; rehabilitation; systematic review; meta-analysis

한글 키워드

요통; 붕대; 물리치료; 키네시오 테이핑; 테이프; 재활; 체계적 문헌고찰; 메타분석

KMCRIC
Summary & Commentary

KMCRIC 비평 보기 +

Korean Study

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN:
Systematic review.

OBJECTIVES:
To investigate the effects of Kinesio Taping (KT) in patients with non-specific low back pain.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA:
KT is widely used in patients with low back pain.

METHODS:
We conducted searches on PubMed, EMBASE, PEDro, SciELO and LILACS up to February 26, 2018. We included only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in adults with chronic non-specific low back pain that compared KT to no intervention or placebo as well as RCTs that compared KT combined with exercise against exercise alone. The methodological quality and statistical reporting of the eligible trials were measured by the 11-item PEDro scale. The quality of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE classification. We considered pain intensity and disability as the primary outcomes. Whenever possible, the data were pooled through meta-analysis.

RESULTS:
We identified eleven RCTs for this systematic review (pooled n = 743). Two clinical trials (pooled n = 100) compared KT to no intervention at the short-term follow-up. Four studies compared KT to placebo (pooled n = 287) at short-term follow-up and two trials (pooled n = 100) compared KT to placebo at intermediate-term follow-up. Five trials (pooled n = 296) compared KT combined with exercises or electrotherapy to exercises or spinal manipulation alone. No statistically significant difference was found for most comparisons.

CONCLUSIONS:
Very low to moderate quality evidence shows that KT was no better than any other intervention for most the outcomes assessed in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain. We found no evidence to support the use of KT in clinical practice for patients with chronic non-specific low back pain.

국문초록

Language

영어

첨부파일