플러스100%마이너스

  • 화면크기
통합검색

한의약융합데이터센터


근거중심한의약 DB

Home > 한의약융합데이터센터 > 근거중심한의약 DB
Title

Alexander Technique Lessons or Acupuncture Sessions for Persons With Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Trial.

Authors

MacPherson H, Tilbrook H, Richmond S, Woodman J, Ballard K, Atkin K, Bland M, Eldred J, Essex H, Hewitt C, Hopton A, Keding A, Lansdown H, Parrott S, Torgerson D, Wenham A, Watt I.

Journal

Ann Intern Med.

Year

2015

Vol (Issue)

163(9)

Page

653-62.

doi

10.7326/M15-0667.

PMID

26524571

Url

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26524571

MeSH

Acupuncture Therapy*/adverse effects
Acupuncture Therapy*/methods
Chronic Pain/economics
Chronic Pain/therapy*
Female
Health Expenditures
Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Neck Pain/economics
Neck Pain/therapy*
Office Visits/statistics & numerical data
Patient Compliance
Prescription Drugs
Self Care*/adverse effects
Self Care*/methods
Self Efficacy
Treatment Outcome

Keywords

한글 키워드

KMCRIC
Summary & Commentary

KMCRIC 비평 보기 +

Korean Study

Abstract

BACKGROUND:
Management of chronic neck pain may benefit from additional active self-care-oriented approaches.
OBJECTIVE:
To evaluate clinical effectiveness of Alexander Technique lessons or acupuncture versus usual care for persons with chronic, nonspecific neck pain.
DESIGN:
Three-group randomized, controlled trial. (Current Controlled Trials: ISRCTN15186354).
SETTING:
U.K. primary care.
PARTICIPANTS:
Persons with neck pain lasting at least 3 months, a score of at least 28% on the Northwick Park Questionnaire (NPQ) for neck pain and associated disability, and no serious underlying pathology.
INTERVENTION:
12 acupuncture sessions or 20 one-to-one Alexander lessons (both 600 minutes total) plus usual care versus usual care alone.
MEASUREMENTS:
NPQ score (primary outcome) at 0, 3, 6, and 12 months (primary end point) and Chronic Pain Self-Efficacy Scale score, quality of life, and adverse events (secondary outcomes).
RESULTS:
517 patients were recruited, and the median duration of neck pain was 6 years. Mean attendance was 10 acupuncture sessions and 14 Alexander lessons. Between-group reductions in NPQ score at 12 months versus usual care were 3.92 percentage points for acupuncture (95% CI, 0.97 to 6.87 percentage points) (P = 0.009) and 3.79 percentage points for Alexander lessons (CI, 0.91 to 6.66 percentage points) (P = 0.010). The 12-month reductions in NPQ score from baseline were 32% for acupuncture and 31% for Alexander lessons. Participant self-efficacy improved for both interventions versus usual care at 6 months (P < 0.001) and was significantly associated (P < 0.001) with 12-month NPQ score reductions (acupuncture, 3.34 percentage points [CI, 2.31 to 4.38 percentage points]; Alexander lessons, 3.33 percentage points [CI, 2.22 to 4.44 percentage points]). No reported serious adverse events were considered probably or definitely related to either intervention.
LIMITATION:
Practitioners belonged to the 2 main U.K.-based professional associations, which may limit generalizability of the findings.
CONCLUSION:
Acupuncture sessions and Alexander Technique lessons both led to significant reductions in neck pain and associated disability compared with usual care at 12 months. Enhanced self-efficacy may partially explain why longer-term benefits were sustained.

국문초록

Language

영어

첨부파일