플러스100%마이너스

통합검색
닫기

KMCRIC 챗봇에게

질문하기!

한의약융합데이터센터


근거중심한의약 DB

Home > 한의약융합데이터센터 > 근거중심한의약 DB
Title

Ultrasound-guided dry needling versus traditional dry needling for patients with knee osteoarthritis: A double-blind randomized controlled trial.

Authors

Pang JCY, Fu ASN, Lam SKH, Peng B, Fu ACL.

Journal

PLoS One.

Year

2022

Vol (Issue)

17(9)

Page

e0274990.

doi

10.1371/journal.pone.0274990.

PMID

36178946

Url

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36178946

MeSH

Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Dry Needling*
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Osteoarthritis, Knee* / diagnostic imaging
Osteoarthritis, Knee* / therapy
Pain
Quality of Life
Treatment Outcome
Ultrasonography, Interventional

Keywords

한글 키워드

KMCRIC
Summary & Commentary

KMCRIC 비평 보기 +

Korean Study

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effect of ultrasound (US)-guided dry needling (DN) with traditional DN in the treatment of pain and dysfunction for patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA).

Design: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial.

Methods: Patients (25 male and 65 female), age 50-80 years diagnosed with KOA were recruited and randomly assigned to one of three groups in a 1:1:1 ratio for intervention: real US-guided DN with exercise therapy (G1), placebo US-guided DN with exercise therapy (G2), and exercise therapy solely (G3). G1 and G2 were blinded to the application of real or placebo US guidance by turning the monitor of US imaging out-of-view from participants' vantage points. The effectiveness of blinding was evaluated by asking the participants whether they had received real-US guided DN. The responses were assessed by Chi-square test. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Knee injury, and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscales (KOOS-pain, KOOS-symptoms, KOOS-quality-of-life (QoL)) were collected at baseline, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks by a blinded assessor. Data were analyzed by mixed model analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni correction.

Results: Eighty-four participants (61.26±5.57 years) completed the study. G1 achieved significant improvement in VAS at 8 weeks compared to G2 and G3 (G1 vs. G2: MD = -15.61, 95% CI [-25.49, -5.51], p = 0.001; G1 vs. G3: MD = -19.90, 95% CI [-29.71, -10.08], p< 0.001). G1 achieved significant improvement in KOOS-pain at 8 weeks compared to G2 and G3 (G1 vs. G2: MD = 9.76, 95% CI [2.38, 17.14], p = 0.006; G1 vs. G3: MD = 9.48, 95% CI [2.31, 16.66], p = 0.010). KOOS-symptoms and KOOS-QoL were not statistically significant between groups. G2 had no significant difference of the perceptions as G1 with p = 0.128. G2 were successfully blinded to placebo US-guided DN.

Conclusion: US-guided DN with exercise therapy may be more effective than traditional DN with exercise therapy or exercise therapy alone in reduce pain of KOA.

국문초록

N

Language

영어

첨부파일